LabVIEW Idea Exchange

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
TurboPhil

Ground-up rewrite of NI-MAX so that it is actually usable

Status: New

How is NI-MAX still so bad after all these years? It goes completely unresponsive and crashes at the slightest provocation. This feels like it should be NI's bread-and-butter.

 

Every LabVIEW team ends up recreating so much of the functionality that NI-MAX is supposed to offer out of the box. Maybe with the discontinuation of NXG, some resources should be allocated to making this product usable.

 

TurboPhil_1-1629324790878.png

 

 

KB articles like this and this probably shouldn't need to exist.

2 Comments
M.Lichtenheld
Member

I partly agree.

A few more features were also great.

  • Better renaming
  • Copy/paste channels and Tasks and whole systems

Just from the top of my head.

crossrulz
Knight of NI

I do know NI is looking to replace MAX.  Last I was aware (it's been at least a year), NI is looking to move functionality from MAX to Instrument Studio.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5